Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007; 74(4):287-291 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2007/045

Callus Distraction Lengthening of the Tibia with the Intramedullary Kinetic Nail (Case Report)Case report

P. VI©ŇA*, E. BEITL, Z. ©MÍDL, J. KALVACH, E. JAGANJAC
Traumatologické oddělení Chirurgické kliniky 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha

In this report the first experience with callus distraction lengthening using the intramedullary kinetic nail is described. This was performed on a left tibia with a total shortening of 34 mm. The distraction phase lasted 36 days and the rate of distraction was 0.95 mm per day. The full weight-bearing of the treated lower extremity was allowed at 12 weeks after surgery. Complete consolidation of the callus was achieved at 112 days and the consolidation index was 3.21 days/mm.
No serious complications were recorded during the post-operative period. At 12 months after surgery, the patient showed a full range of motion in the knee, his ankle range of motion was S 15-0-35, and he achieved an excellent functional outcome on evaluation by Paley's classification.

Keywords: lengthening of the tibia, intramedullary kinetic nail, callus distraction

Accepted: January 15, 2007; Published: August 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
VI©ŇA P, BEITL E, ©MÍDL Z, KALVACH J, JAGANJAC E. Callus Distraction Lengthening of the Tibia with the Intramedullary Kinetic Nail (Case Report). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007;74(4):287-291. doi: 10.55095/achot2007/045. PubMed PMID: 17877947.
Download citation

References

  1. ALDEGHERI, R.: Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the tibia in patients who have limb-length discrepancy or short stature. J. Bone Jt Surg., 81-A: 624-634, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. BAUMGART, R., BETZ, A., SCHWEIBERER, L.: A fully implantable motorized intramedullary nail for limb lengthening and bone transport. Clin. Orthop., 343: 135-143, 1997. Go to original source...
  3. COLE, J. D., JUSTIN, D., KASPARIS, T., DEVLUGHT, D., KNOBLOCH, C.: The instramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury, 32(S4): 129-139, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. GARCIA-CIMBRELO, E., CURTO, A., CARCIA-REY, E., CORDERO, J., MARTI-CIRUELOS, R.: The intramedullary elongation nail for femoral lengthening. J. Bone Jt Surg., 84-B: 971-977, 2002. Go to original source...
  5. GUICHET, J. M., CASAR, R. S.: Mechanical characterization of a totally intramedullary gradual elongation nail. Clin. Orthop., 337: 281-290, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. GUICHET, J. M., DEROMEDIS, B., DONNAN, L. T., PERETTI, G., LASCOMBES, P., BADO, F.: Gradual femoral lengthening with the Albizzia intramedullary nail. J. Bone Jt Surg., 85-A: 838-848, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. HANKEMEIER, S., PAPE, H. CH., GOSLING, T., HUFNER, T., KRETTEK, CH.: Improved comfort in lower limb lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 124: 129-133, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. NOONAN, K. J., LEYES, M., FORRIOL, F., CANADELL, J.: Distraction osteogenesis of the lower extremity with use of monolateral external fixation. A study of two hundred and sixty-one femora and tibiae. J. Bone Jt Surg., 80-A: 793-806, 1998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. PALEY, D.: Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin. Orthop., 250: 81-104, 1990. Go to original source...
  10. PALEY, D., HERZENBERG, J. E., PAREMAIN, G., BHAVE, A.: Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J. Bone Jt Surg., 79-A: 1464-1480, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. RASCHKE, M. J., MANN, J. W., OEDEKOVEN, G., CLAUDI, B. F.: Segmental transport after unreamed intramedullary nailing. Preliminary report of a "Monorail" system. Clin. Orthop., 282: 233-240, 1992. Go to original source...