Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014; 81(6):355-364 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2014/049

Hojení zlomenin: kostní hojení jako výsledek fascinující kaskády fyzikálních a biologických interakcí. Pokus o integraci pozorování z 30letého výzkumu AO v Davosu. Část I.Souborný referát

S. M. Perren*
AO Research Institute Davos, Switzerland

The choice of best procedure in fracture treatment relies on a proper understanding of tissue reactions to the prevailing mechanical and biological conditions. Investing time and effort is rewarding as it opens up access to a fascinating world and improves fracture treatment based on logical decision making.
An intact bony skeleton enables mechanical functions of the human body such as locomotion. This function of the bone is made possible by its stiffness and strength, which allows bone to carry load without undergoing major deformation while remaining intact even under heavy loads. The shortcoming of bone as a strong and stiff material is its brittleness. Its brittleness prevents bone from bridging a fracture under unstable conditions. In spontaneous healing or healing under flexible fixation, a cascade of repair tissues stabilizes the fracture and allows for solid bony union.
Excessive load fractures the bone. Disrupted bone loses its stiffness. Loss of stiffness and, consequently, loss of skeletal support disables the function of the limb. Fracture healing is a ubiquitous and spontaneous process which restores stiffness as a prerequisite for mechanical function. Restoration of mechanical integrity requires that bone bridges and/or remodels the fracture site. If there is high initial tissue deformation (strain) at the fracture site, bone as a brittle material cannot bridge the gap. In spontaneous healing or healing under flexible fixation a cascade of consecutive phases of tissue differentiation are required to overcome this shortcoming of bone. The cascade increases tissue stiffness at the expense of tolerance to deformation until a low value of interfragmental strain is reached that then allows bone to form a solid bridge.
The cascade of differentiation is impressive as a "reasonable" process with a goal. Therefore, bone healing is often considered as a rational process where the repair tissues are expected "to think and to act in order to achieve". We propose the observation of bone reactions without assuming that these reactions are guided by goal-oriented intelligence because the latter is non-existent. Observing the unexpected without having a preconceived opinion is a precondition for new insight. This approach avoids being misled into projecting one's own thinking into tissues that react without goal orientation.
Fracture healing is a repair process which requires induction and must be enabled. To get a feel for the problem we will first address the mechanical properties of bone as the prerequisites for its mechanical functions. Then we will discuss which conditions induce and which enable the repair process. The following paper addresses a fascinating interplay between physical and biological processes that enable fractured bone to bridge solidly and remodel to regain its "pre-fracture" function and structure.
No one of the different treatment modalities or healing patterns is best on its own. For a given situation the goal is to recover the function of the bone, limb and patient early and permanently by choosing the optimal procedure and implant. Understanding bone reactions permits a rational choice and replaces subjective predilection and monomania. The stability of the fixation and the blood supply are priority considerations, which must often be weighed against each other.
Preamble
The choice of best procedure in fracture treatment relies on a proper understanding of tissue reactions to the prevailing mechanical and biological conditions. Investing time and effort is rewarding as it opens up access to a fascinating world and improves fracture treatment based on logical decision making.
An intact bony skeleton enables mechanical functions of the human body such as locomotion. This function of the bone is made possible by its stiffness and strength, which allows bone to carry load without undergoing

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2014  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Perren SM. Hojení zlomenin: kostní hojení jako výsledek fascinující kaskády fyzikálních a biologických interakcí. Pokus o integraci pozorování z 30letého výzkumu AO v Davosu. Část I. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81(6):355-364. doi: 10.55095/achot2014/049. PubMed PMID: 25651289.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. del Prete, F., Nizegorodcew, T., Regazzoni, P.: Quantification of surgical trauma: comparison of conventional and minimally invasive surgical techniques for pertrochanteric fracture surgery based on markers of inflammation (interleukins). J. Orthop Traumatol. 13(3):125-130, 2012 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  2. Dubs, L.: (ed.), Orthopädie an der Schwelle, Hans Huber Verlag Bern, 2000.
  3. Fernandez Dell>Oca, A. A., Tepic, S., Frigg, R. Meisser, A., Haas, N., Perren, S. M.: Treating forearm fractures using an internal fixator: a prospective study. Clin. Orthop., 389:196-205, 2001
  4. Ganz, R., Perren, S. M., Rueter, A.: Mechanische Induktion der Knochenresorption. Fortschr. Kiefer Gesichtschir., 19: 45-49, 1975.
  5. Gautier, E., Perren, S. M.: Die Reaktion der Kortikalis nach Verplattung - eine Folge der Belastungsveraenderung des Knochens oder Vaskularitaetsprobleme? in: Die Plattenosteosynthese und ihre Konkurrenzverfahren, Springer Verlag, 1991, 21-37. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Haas, N., Hauke, C., Schuetz, M., Kaeaeb, M., Perren, S.M.: Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm using the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix): Results of 387 fractures of a prospective multicentric study (PC-Fix II). Injury, 32: AO ASIF Scientific Supplement, 51-62, 2001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  7. Kleist, P., Pharmazeutische Medizin: Humanforschungsgesetz - ein Spagat zwischen Persönlichkeitsrechten und Forschungsinteressen, Schweiz Med. Forum, 13, 2013. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Müller, M. E., Allgoewer, M., Willenegger, H.: Technik der operativen Frakturenbehandlung. Springer-Verlag, 1963. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Perren, S. M., Boitzy, A.: Cellular differentiation and bone biomechanics during the consolidation of a fracture. Anatomia Clinica, 1: 13-28, 1978. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. Perren, S.M.: Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 138: 175-196, 1979.
  11. Perren, S. M.: Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: the scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology J. Bone Jt Surg., 84-B: 1093-1110, 2002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Perren, S.M.: Optimizing the degree of fixation stability based on the strain. Orthopäde, 39: 132-138, 2010. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  13. Perren, S. M., Regazzoni, P., Fernandez, A.A.: Biomechanical and biological aspects of defect treatment in fractures using helical plates. Acta Chir. Orthop. Traum. čech., 81: 267-271, 2014. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. Rahn, B. A., Gallinaro, P., Baltensperger, A., Perren, S. M.: Primary bone healing. An experimental study in the rabbit. J. Bone Jt Surg. 53-A: 783-786, 1971. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Regazzoni, P., Fernandez, A., Perren, S. M.: Qualitätskontrolle und Transparenz: langfristig zählen nur konkrete Aktionen. Schweizerische Aerztezeitung, 94: 29-30, 2013. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Tepic, S., Remiger, A. R., Morikawa, K., Predieri, M., Perren, S. M.: Strength recovery in fractured sheep tibia treated with a plate or an internal fixator: an experimental study with a two-year follow-up. J. Orthop. Trauma. 11: 14-23, 1997. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  17. Yamada, H.: Strength of Biological Materials Gaynor Evans, F., (ed.): The Williams & Wilkins Company Baltimore, 1970.