Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017; 84(4):271-278 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2017/042

Mid-Term to Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Oval-Shaped Acetabular Cup - TC TypeOriginal papers

E. ©«ASTNÝ1,*, T. TRČ1, J. FRÝDL1, Z. KOPEČNÝ1, T. PHILIPPOU1, J. LISÝ2
1 Klinika dětské a dospělé ortopedie a traumatologie 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
2 Klinika zobrazovacích metod 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha

INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of our paper is to evaluate the mid-term to long-term results and to confirm the basic criteria of a high-quality revision implant: safe bridging of bone defects, achievement of reliable primary fixation of revision acetabular cup, achievement of good secondary stability with documentable osteointegration of cup and demonstration of remodelling of transplanted bone tissue in the area of defects and in spaces between the implant ribs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Altogether 36 patients (38 cups) were evaluated who had undergone revision hip arthroplasty in the period from 2004 to 2010. The mean follow-up was 8.2 years (5.1-11.6 years after the reimplantation, more than 10 years in 16 patients who underwent surgery). The position and osseointegration of the implant were assessed by digital radiography, the remodelling of transplanted bone tissues in the area of defects and between the implant ribs by computed tomography with reducing artefacts around the metal implant (Aquilion 64 - Toshiba Medical Systems), and for the clinical outcomes the Harris Hip Score was used.

RESULTS:
Preoperatively, the condition of the hip joint based on the Harris Hip Score was in 30 cases evaluated as poor, in 8 patients as satisfactory. At the time of final evaluation, 8 patients achieved excellent results, in 19 patients the condition of the joint was very good (in 2 patients bilaterally), in 6 patients it was considered satisfactory and in 3 patients poor. The mean value for HHS increased from 39.5 to 84.5. Based on the radiography evaluation, in 27 patients (in 2 patients bilaterally) the osseointegration of the revision cup was good, in 8 cases with a radiolucent line of 2-4 mm in width in DeLee zone III, in one case proximal migration of the cup occurred caused by deep infection. The informed consent form for pelvic CT was signed by 25 patients of our cohort. Remodelling of bone tissue in the space between the ribs of the implant was always detected, the presence of bone cysts was not reported, the bone defects following the application of autologous spongioplasty in the monitored patients were healed. In 6 patients, an ingrowth of fibrous tissue of 2-4 mm in width in the convexity of the cup was detected. The mean survival of the revision oval-shaped cup - TC type with a follow-up of 8.2 years after the reimplantation based on Kaplan-Meier analysis was 91.4 %.

DISCUSSION:
The number of revision total hip arthroplasties due to a younger age of patients who undergo alloplasty keeps growing. The choice of a revision implant should always match the intraoperative finding and the bone tissue quality. The standard uncemented implants with osteoactive surface can be opted for when anterior and posterior column of the acetabulum are intact (IIA and IIB according to Paprosky). Starting from type IIC, also the proximal part of acetabulum shall be considered. At our department, preference is given to the revision cup - TC type. The oval shape facilitates a lower degree of bone resection and easier restoration of the anatomical centre of rotation. Careful debridement of granulating and necrotic tissue, thorough treatment of bone defects and osteoactive surface of implants in case of adequate primary fixation of the cup substantially contribute to the quality of its osseointegration. Greater rigidity of fixation verified by pull-out tests enables to insert angular stable screws into the gaps in the proximal part of the cup. There is still room for improvement in treating the bone defect. The application of allogenic bone grafts into the defects and spaces between the ribs of the TC cup is more challenging than the use of augmentation in the systems with trabecular titanium. Based on the evaluation of CT scans, remodelling of the transplanted bone occurs, therefore the defect zone is reduced.

CONCLUSIONS:
The oval-shaped uncemented cup - type TC meets the requirements placed on a state-of the art revision implant, moreover its specific construction helps improve the conditions where another re-operation of acetabulum is necessary. By evaluating mid-term to long-term results of non-homogenous group of 36 patients (38 cups) we have obtained data on joint function comparable to similar groups with revision uncemented implants presented in our and foreign literature.

Keywords: revision oval-shaped cup, bone remodelling, pull-out tests, angular stable screws, computed tomography

Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©«ASTNÝ E, TRČ T, FRÝDL J, KOPEČNÝ Z, PHILIPPOU T, LISÝ J. Mid-Term to Long-Term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Oval-Shaped Acetabular Cup - TC Type. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(4):271-278. doi: 10.55095/achot2017/042. PubMed PMID: 28933329.
Download citation

References

  1. Altman A, Carmiri R. A double-layer detector dual-energy CT- principles, advantages and applications. Med Phys., http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3182434,2009;36:2750.
  2. Beckmann NA, Weiss S, Klotz MC, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Bitsch RG. Loosening after acetabular revision :comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings. A systemic review. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:229-235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cameron HU. Cavity-filling components:when round isn t right. Orthopedics. 2001;24: 879-880. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Cameron HU, Smula V. Use of oblong socket in hip revision surgery. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1997;66:7-9.
  5. Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopperr H Jr, Mc Auley JP, Engh CA. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:197-206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Civinini R, Capone A, Carulli C, Villano M, Gusso MI. Acetabular revision using a cementless oblong cup:five to ten year results. Int Orthop. 2008;32:189-193. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, Fernandes J. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1245-1250. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. DeBoer DK, Christie MJ. Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis:three- to seven-year result. J. Arthroplasty. 1998;6:674-680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Engh CA Jr, Engh CA, Culpepper WJ. Long term results of AML system. Sicot meeting, Amsterodam, 1996, pp.692.
  10. Fousek J, Vaąek P. Oblong cup in the management of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in total hip replacement. Scand J Surg. 2007;96:319-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Tapia M, Martin-Hervac C. Multislice computed tomography for evaluating acetabular defects in revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:138-143. Go to original source...
  12. Götze C, Sippel C, Senft G, Steinbeck J. Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003;41:182-189. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Hugate RR, Dickey ID, Chen WQ, Wood CM, Sim FH, Rock MG. Fixed-angle screws vs standard screws in acetabular prosthesis fixation:a cadaveric biomechanical study. J. Arthroplasty. 2009;24:806-814. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Köster G, Randings S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup:an average 9-year follow up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;5:603-608. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Köster G, Willert HG, Koulet HP, Doplena KJ. An oblong revision cup for large acetabular defects:Design rationale and two- to seven-year follow-up. Arthroplasty. 1998;13:559-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Landor I, Vavřík P, Jahoda D, Pokorný D, Popelka S, Sosna A. Oválné implantáty v problematice revizí totálních náhrad kyčelního kloubu. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009;76:462-472. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lee H, Parka KK, Song HT, Kim S, Suh JS. Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1331-1340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Li B. Dual-energy CT with fast-kVp switching and its applications in orthopedics. OMICS. J Radiology. 2013;2:1-8. Go to original source...
  19. Marin E, Fedrizzi L, Regis M, Pressacco M, Zagra L, Fusi S. Stability enhancement of prosthetic implants: friction analysis of Trabecular TitaniumTM. Hip International. 2012;22:427-428.
  20. Martell JM, Pierson RH 3rd, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Maley M, Galante JO. Primary total hip reconstruction with titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;55:554-571. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Richard S, Siewerdsen JH. Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task. Med Phys. 2007;34:127-139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Sandgren B, Crafoord J, Garellick G, Carlsson L, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona H. Computed tomography vs. digital radiography assessment for detection of osteolysis in asymptomatic patiens with uncemented cups:a proposal for a new classification system based on computer tomography. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:156-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Sommer C. Biomechanics and clinical application principles of locking plates. Suomen Ortopedia ja Traumatologia. 2006;1:20-24.
  25. ©teňo B, Kokavec M, Nečas L: Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants. Int Orthop. 2015;39:389-395. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. ©»astný E, Trč T, Handl M, Frýdl J, Kopečný Z. Střednědobé výsledky a naąe zkuąenosti s necementovanou endoprotézou kyčelního kloubu typu S.F. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009;76:487-494. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. ©»astný E, Trč T, Handl M, Kos P, Kautzner J, Philippou T, Lisý J. Mid-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty using the oval-shaped uncemented Trč-Cingr cup. Int Orthop. 2014;38:935-940. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. ©»astný E, Trč T, Matěj D, Sekerka M. Srovnání primární fixace TC revizní oválné jamky při pouľití úhlově stabilních a běľných ąroubů. Ortopedie. 2012;5:211-214.
  29. Trč T, ©»astný E. Pouľití oválné TC jamky při revizních operacích totálních náhrad kyčelního kloubu. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:506-511. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Weber KI, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A 5-8 years follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;78:982-994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...