Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018; 85(4):281-284 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2018/049

Gait Analysis before and after Cycle Training Using a 3D Pedal SystemOriginal papers

T. ZIPPELIUS1,*, K. SANDER1, F. LAYHER1, J. TÖPFER2, G. MATZIOLIS1
1 Orthopaedic Department, Jena University Hospital, Campus Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Germany
2 BioConform GmbH, Jena, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
In this pilot study, gait analysis was performed before and after training with a 3D pedal system (BIUS1), in order to clarify whether these differences are detectable by gait analysis after a short period of training.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Two female and three male subjects were included in a prospective case-control pilot study. The patient and training characteristics were determined. Objective measurement data of the gait were obtained by using a three-dimensional motion analysis system with six infrared cameras and three force plates before and after training with the 3D pedal system.

RESULTS:
The mean age was 36.7 ± 8.7 years and the subjects had a BMI of 21.8 ± 2.4 kg/m2. The training time per year was an average of 36.0 ± 11.2 days, with a training workload of 511.4 ± 36.7 km.
For time-distance parameters, improvements for the left and right side were obtained for cadence and cycle time after training. In total, there was a reduction in hip abduction angle, and an increase in hip inward rotation, knee outward rotation, and range of the frontal knee angle.

CONCLUSIONS:
Changes in parameters in the gait analysis after a short training interval demonstrate that a 3D pedal system is suitable to produce changes in the gait pattern detectable by gait analysis. Training effects on the supposedly weaker left side can be explained after a brief application of the BIUS1 system.

Keywords: cycle training, 3D pedal system, gait analysis

Published: August 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ZIPPELIUS T, SANDER K, LAYHER F, TÖPFER J, MATZIOLIS G. Gait Analysis before and after Cycle Training Using a 3D Pedal System. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(4):281-284. doi: 10.55095/achot2018/049. PubMed PMID: 30257760.
Download citation

References

  1. da Silva JC, Tarassova O, Ekblom MM, Andersson E, Rönquist G, Arndt A. Quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity during cycling as measured with intramuscular electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116:1807-1817. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. de Groot G, Welbergen E, Clijsen L, Clarijs J, Cabri J, Antonis J. Power, muscular work, and external forces in cycling. Ergonomics. 1994;37:31-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dettori NJ, Norvell DC. Non-traumatic bicycle injuries: a review of the literature. Sports Med. 2006;36:7-18. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ditunno J, Scivoletto G. Clinical relevance of gait research applied to clinical trials in spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull. 2009;78:35-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Dorel S, Drouet JM, Couturier A, Champoux Y, Hug F. Changes of pedaling technique and muscle coordination during an exhaustive exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1277-1286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Ericson MO, Bratt A, Nisell R, Arborelius UP, Ekholm J. Power output and work in different muscle groups during ergometer cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55:229-235. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Formenti F, Minetti AE, Borrani F. Pedaling rate is an important determinant of human oxygen uptake during exercise on the cycle ergometer. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. García-López J, Díez-Leal S, Ogueta-Alday A, Larrazabal J, Rodríguez-Marroyo JA. Differences in pedalling technique between road cyclists of different competitive levels. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1619-1626. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gardner JK, Zhang S, Liu H, Klipple G, Stewart C, Milner CE, Asif IM. Effects of toe-in angles on knee biomechanics in cycling of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:276-282. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Gregersen CS, Hull ML, Hakansson NA. How changing the inversion/eversion foot angle affects the nondriving intersegmental knee moments and the relative activation of the vastii muscles in cycling. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128:391-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gregor RJ, Wheeler JB. Biomechanical factors associated with shoe/pedal interfaces. Implications for injury. Sports Med. 1994;17:117-131 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lucareli PR, Lima MO, Lima FP, de Almeida JG, Brech GC, D'Andréa Greve JM. Gait analysis following treadmill training with body weight support versus conventional physical therapy: a prospective randomized controlled single blind study. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:1001-1007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Ruby P, Hull ML. Response of intersegmental knee loads to foot/pedal platform degrees of freedom in cycling. J Biomech. 1993;26:1327-1340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Ruby P, Hull ML, Kirby KA, Jenkins DW. The effect of lower-limb anatomy on knee loads during seated cycling. J Biomech. 1992;25:1195-1207. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Sander K, Rosenbaum D, Böhm H, Layher F, Lindner T, Wegener R, Wolf SI, Seehaus F. [Instrumented gait and movement analysis of musculoskeletal diseases]. Orthopade. 2012;41:802-819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Segal NA, Yack HJ, Brubaker M, Torner JC, Wallace R. Association of dynamic joint power with functional limitations in older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1821-1828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Wanich T, Hodgkins C, Columbier JA, Muraski E, Kennedy JG. Cycling injuries of the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:748-756. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...