Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018; 85(4):281-284 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2018/049
Gait Analysis before and after Cycle Training Using a 3D Pedal SystemOriginal papers
- 1 Orthopaedic Department, Jena University Hospital, Campus Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Germany
- 2 BioConform GmbH, Jena, Germany
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
In this pilot study, gait analysis was performed before and after training with a 3D pedal system (BIUS1), in order to clarify whether these differences are detectable by gait analysis after a short period of training.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Two female and three male subjects were included in a prospective case-control pilot study. The patient and training characteristics were determined. Objective measurement data of the gait were obtained by using a three-dimensional motion analysis system with six infrared cameras and three force plates before and after training with the 3D pedal system.
RESULTS:
The mean age was 36.7 ± 8.7 years and the subjects had a BMI of 21.8 ± 2.4 kg/m2. The training time per year was an average of 36.0 ± 11.2 days, with a training workload of 511.4 ± 36.7 km.
For time-distance parameters, improvements for the left and right side were obtained for cadence and cycle time after training. In total, there was a reduction in hip abduction angle, and an increase in hip inward rotation, knee outward rotation, and range of the frontal knee angle.
CONCLUSIONS:
Changes in parameters in the gait analysis after a short training interval demonstrate that a 3D pedal system is suitable to produce changes in the gait pattern detectable by gait analysis. Training effects on the supposedly weaker left side can be explained after a brief application of the BIUS1 system.
Keywords: cycle training, 3D pedal system, gait analysis
Published: August 1, 2018 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- da Silva JC, Tarassova O, Ekblom MM, Andersson E, Rönquist G, Arndt A. Quadriceps and hamstring muscle activity during cycling as measured with intramuscular electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116:1807-1817.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- de Groot G, Welbergen E, Clijsen L, Clarijs J, Cabri J, Antonis J. Power, muscular work, and external forces in cycling. Ergonomics. 1994;37:31-42.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dettori NJ, Norvell DC. Non-traumatic bicycle injuries: a review of the literature. Sports Med. 2006;36:7-18.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ditunno J, Scivoletto G. Clinical relevance of gait research applied to clinical trials in spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull. 2009;78:35-42.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Dorel S, Drouet JM, Couturier A, Champoux Y, Hug F. Changes of pedaling technique and muscle coordination during an exhaustive exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1277-1286.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ericson MO, Bratt A, Nisell R, Arborelius UP, Ekholm J. Power output and work in different muscle groups during ergometer cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;55:229-235.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Formenti F, Minetti AE, Borrani F. Pedaling rate is an important determinant of human oxygen uptake during exercise on the cycle ergometer. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12500.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- García-López J, Díez-Leal S, Ogueta-Alday A, Larrazabal J, Rodríguez-Marroyo JA. Differences in pedalling technique between road cyclists of different competitive levels. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:1619-1626.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gardner JK, Zhang S, Liu H, Klipple G, Stewart C, Milner CE, Asif IM. Effects of toe-in angles on knee biomechanics in cycling of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:276-282.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gregersen CS, Hull ML, Hakansson NA. How changing the inversion/eversion foot angle affects the nondriving intersegmental knee moments and the relative activation of the vastii muscles in cycling. J Biomech Eng. 2006;128:391-398.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gregor RJ, Wheeler JB. Biomechanical factors associated with shoe/pedal interfaces. Implications for injury. Sports Med. 1994;17:117-131
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lucareli PR, Lima MO, Lima FP, de Almeida JG, Brech GC, D'Andréa Greve JM. Gait analysis following treadmill training with body weight support versus conventional physical therapy: a prospective randomized controlled single blind study. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:1001-1007.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ruby P, Hull ML. Response of intersegmental knee loads to foot/pedal platform degrees of freedom in cycling. J Biomech. 1993;26:1327-1340.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ruby P, Hull ML, Kirby KA, Jenkins DW. The effect of lower-limb anatomy on knee loads during seated cycling. J Biomech. 1992;25:1195-1207.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Sander K, Rosenbaum D, Böhm H, Layher F, Lindner T, Wegener R, Wolf SI, Seehaus F. [Instrumented gait and movement analysis of musculoskeletal diseases]. Orthopade. 2012;41:802-819.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Segal NA, Yack HJ, Brubaker M, Torner JC, Wallace R. Association of dynamic joint power with functional limitations in older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1821-1828.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wanich T, Hodgkins C, Columbier JA, Muraski E, Kennedy JG. Cycling injuries of the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:748-756.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...