Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(6):409-413 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/064

Occult Injuries to Posterior Pelvic Segment in Elderly Patients with Pubic Rami FracturesOriginal papers

J. BIELÁK1,*, R. HART1,2
1 Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení, Nemocnice Znojmo
2 Klinika traumatologie, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita v Brně

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The incidence of pelvic fractures in geriatric population has been increasing. The diagnostic method of first choice is plain pelvic anteroposterior X-ray which, however, mostly reveals merely the pubic rami fractures. The pain caused by undiagnosed lesion of the posterior pelvic segment may substantially reduce the patient s mobility, thus also their self-sufficiency which is crucial in elderly patients. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence of an occult injury to the posterior pelvic ring in patients with an X-ray finding of pubic rami fractures only.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Throughout a three-year period (2017-2019), the incidence of an occult injury to the posterior pelvic ring was evaluated by means of a CT scan in 50 patients aged 65 years and over, in whom the plain anteroposterior pelvic radiograph initially revealed only the pubic rami fractures. The mean age of 35 women and 15 men was 76 years (the range of 65-94 years).

RESULTS:
In 15 patients (30%) only, the CT scan confirmed the isolated pubic rami fracture. In the remaining 35 cases (70%), the CT scan revealed an injury to the posterior pelvic segment, namely in 32 cases ipsilaterally, in one case contralaterally and in two patients bilaterally. In 4 patients (8%) only, signs of the injury to the posterior pelvic segment were subsequently found on the plain X-ray of the pelvis.

DISCUSSION:
Diagnosis of a pubic rami fracture in geriatric patients solely based on the performed X-ray can be misleading. It has been proven in our prospective study that majority of injuries to posterior pelvic ring is not detected on the plain X-ray, which is also the conclusion arrived at by foreign authors. The CT scan alone can safely determine the actual extent of the pelvic injury. While the isolated injuries to the anterior pelvic ring show biomechanical stability, and thus are less painful and can be successfully treated non-operatively, the associated injuries to the posterior pelvic ring can cause a certain degree of instability, which has to be reflected in treatment strategy.

CONCLUSIONS:
Injuries to the posterior pelvic segment in geriatric population are much more frequent than expected. They are, however, rarely distinguishable on a plain radiograph. Often times, only the pubic rami fractures are clearly visible. The fractures of posterior segment tend to be accompanied by a higher number of complications and a worse prognosis. A reliable method to detect these injuries is the unenhanced CT scan of the pelvis that should be performed routinely in all the patients with pubic rami fractures identified on a radiograph. In cases when pain substantially limits the mobilisation of the patients, minimally invasive surgical treatment should be considered.

Keywords: pelvic ring injury, pubic rami, geriatric population

Published: December 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BIELÁK J, HART R. Occult Injuries to Posterior Pelvic Segment in Elderly Patients with Pubic Rami Fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(6):409-413. doi: 10.55095/achot2020/064. PubMed PMID: 33408006.
Download citation

References

  1. Alnaib M, Waters S, Shanshal Y, Caplan N, Jones S, St Clair Gibson A, Kader D. Combined pubic rami and sacral osteoporotic fractures: a prospective study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;13:97-103. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Banierink H, Ten Duis K, de Vries R, Wendt K, Heineman E, Reininga I, IJpma F. Pelvic ring injury in the elderly: fragile patients with substantial mortality rates and long-term physical impairment. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0216809. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Breuil V, Roux CH, Carle GF. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, consequences, and medical management. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016;28:442-447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465-475. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37:691-697. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Gertzbein SD, Chenoweth DR. Occult injuries of the pelvic ring. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;128,202-207. Go to original source...
  7. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Järvinen M. Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970-1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:443-448. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Küper MA, Trulson A, Stuby FM, Stöckle U. Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:313-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lau TW, Leung F. Occult posterior pelvic ring fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic pubic rami fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010;18:153-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Loggers SAI, Joosse P, Jan Ponsen K. Outcome of pubic rami fractures with or without concomitant involvement of the posterior ring in elderly patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;45:1021-1029. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Newgard CB, Sharpless NE. Coming of age: molecular drivers of aging and therapeutic opportunities. J Clin Invest. 2013;123: 946-950. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Newhouse KE, el-Khoury GY, Buckwalter JA. Occult sacral fractures in osteopenic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1472-1477. Go to PubMed...
  13. Peh WC, Khong PL, Ho WY, Yeung HW, Luk KD. Sacral insufficiency fractures. Spectrum of radiological features. Clin Imaging. 1995;19:92-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Pennal GF, Tile M, Waddell JP, Garside H. Pelvic disruption: assessment and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;151:12-21. Go to original source...
  15. Peris P, Guanabens N, Pons F, Herranz R, Monegal A, Suris X,Munoz-Gomez J. Clinical evolution of sacral stress frac-tures: influence of additional pelvic fractures. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52:545-547. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rommens PM, Arand C, Hofmann A, Wagner D. When and how to operate fragility fractures of the pelvis. Indian J Orthop. 2019;53:128-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44:1733-1744. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Minimal invasive surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Chirurgie. 2017;112:524-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Surgical management of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: a new challenge. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:499-509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Schapira D, Militeanu D, Israel O, Scharf Y. Insufficiency fractures of the pubic ramus. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1996;25:373-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Soles Gls, Ferguson TA. Fragility fractures of the pelvis. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5:222-228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Studer P, Suhm N, Zappe B, Bless N, Jakob M. Pubic rami fractures in the elderly: a neglected injury?. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13859. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Wagner D, Ossendorf C, Gruszka D, Hofmann A, Rommens PM. Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41:349-362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Wagner D, Kamer L, Sawaguchi T, Richards RG, Noser H, Rommens PM. Sacral bone mass distribution assessed by averaged three-dimensional CT models. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:584-590. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Gary L, Kilgore M, Saag K. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:46-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...