Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(6):421-428 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/066

Open Incisional Biopsy and Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Extremity-Localized Musculoskeletal TumorsOriginal papers

L. PAZOUREK1,*, I. STANICZKOVÁ ZAMBO2, T. TOMÁŠ1, M. MAHDAL1
1 I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
2 Ústav patologie, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
To evaluate the results of incisional open biopsies and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies for musculoskeletal lesions in extremity and limb girdle locations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
In 2019, 176 open incisional biopsies were performed at our department, 113 from bone lesions and 63 from soft tissue lesions. In the period of September 2019 to February 2020, we started performing also ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies from soft tissue lesions in limited indications, namely in 23 cases. The diagnostic accuracy, complications and pain associated with the procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS:
Of 113 open incisional biopsies of bone, 91.1% was fully representative and 6.2% non-representative with an indication for re-biopsy. In 53 cases another surgical procedure followed, which fully confirmed the diagnosis made based on the biopsy in 79.2%. In 7.5% the diagnosis slightly changed, with no therapeutic impact, in 5.7% the histological grade was changed, and in 7.5% the diagnosis was substantially modified. Complications appeared in 9.8% of cases. The procedure was associated with pain expressed by an increase in VAS score by 2.7 points.
Of 63 soft tissue open incisional biopsies, 100% was fully representative. In 30 cases another surgical procedure followed, which fully confirmed the diagnosis made based on the biopsy in 96.7%, in one case the diagnosis was changed from aggressive benign lesion to a low-grade sarcoma. Complications appeared in 6.4% of cases. The procedure was associated with pain expressed by an increase in VAS score by 1.4 points.
Of 23 ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies from soft tissues in limited indications, 100% was representative. In 11 cases another surgical procedure followed, which fully confirmed the diagnosis made based on the biopsy in 81.8%, in 2 cases the diagnosis was slightly changed, with no therapeutic impact or a change of histological grade. No complications were reported. The procedure was associated with minimal pain expressed by an increase in VAS score by 0.1 points.
When comparing the group of soft tissue open incisional biopsies and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies, a statistically significant less pain associated with the procedure was found in the group of core needle biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS:
The biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors should be performed at specialty centers for treatment of these rare conditions. In that case it produces good results and is associated with a low rate of complications. Indications for open biopsy or core needle biopsy must be assessed individually.

Keywords: musculoskeletal tumors, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, open incisional biopsy, core needle biopsy, fine needle aspiration biopsy, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy

Published: December 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PAZOUREK L, STANICZKOVÁ ZAMBO I, TOMÁŠ T, MAHDAL M. Open Incisional Biopsy and Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Extremity-Localized Musculoskeletal Tumors. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(6):421-428. doi: 10.55095/achot2020/066. PubMed PMID: 33408008.
Download citation

References

  1. Adámková Krákorová D a kol. Sarkomy. Mladá fronta, Praha, 2019.
  2. Barrientos-Ruiz I, Ortiz-Cruz EJ, Serrano-Montilla J, Bernabeu-Taboada D, Pozo-Kreilinger JJ. Are biopsy tracts a concern for seeding and local recurrence in sarcomas?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:511-518. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Binitie O, Tejiram S, Conway S, Cheong D, Temple HT, Letson GD. Adult soft tissue sarcoma local recurrence after adjutant treatment without resection of core needle biopsy tract. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:891-898. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Einarsdótirr H, Söderlund V, Skoog L, Bauer HC. Dynamic MRI and fine needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of soft tissue leasions. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:695-700. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Errani C, Traina F, Perna F, Calamelli C, Faldini C. Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:538152. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Ferguson KB, McGlynn J, Jane M, Ritchie D, Mahendra A. Outcome of image-guided biopsies: Retrospective review of the West of Scotland musculoskeletal oncology service. Surgeon. 2016;14:87-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Holzapfel BM, Lüdemann M, Holzapfel DE, Rechl H, Rudert M. Open biopsy of bone and soft tissue tumors : guidelines for precise surgical procedures. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24:403-415; quiz 416-417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Khoja H, Griffin A, Dickson B, Wunder J, Ferguson P, Howarth D, Kandel R. Sampling modality influences the predictive value of grading in adult soft tissue extremity sarcomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137:1774-1779. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Kiatisevi P, Thanakit V, Sukunthanak B, Boonthatip M, Bumrungchart S, Witoonchart K. Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy versus incisional biopsy in diagnosing musculoskeletal lesions. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013;21:204-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kilpatrick SE, Cappellari JO, Bos GD, Gold SH, Ward WG. Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001;115:59-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Malawer MM, Witting JC, Bickels J. Operative techniques in orthopaedic surgical oncology. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, 2016.
  12. Mankin HJ, Lange TA, Spanier SS. The hazards of biopsy in patients with malignant primary bone and soft-tissue tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1121-1127. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Na J, Fang ZW, Zhao AL, Li JY. [Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2013;42:158-162. Go to PubMed...
  14. Ng VY, Thomas K, Crist M, Wakely PE Jr, Mayerson J. Fine needle aspiration for clinical triage of extremity soft tissue masses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1120-1128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Amann G, Krssak M, Panotopoulos J, Szomolanyi P, Weber M, Czerny C, Breitenseher M, Grabner G, Bogner W, Nemec S, Dominkus M, Funovics P, Windhager R, Trattnig S. Use of diagnostic dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI for targeting of soft tissue tumour biopsies at 3T: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2041-2048. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Panda KG, Hale MJ, Kruger D, Luvhengo TE. Comparison between preoperative biopsy and post-excision histology results in sarcoma: experience at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr J Surg. 2014;52:45-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pohlig F, Kirchhoff C, Lenze U, Schauwecker J, Burgkart R, Rechl H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R. Percutaneous core needle biopsy versus open biopsy in diagnostics of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2012;17:29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Siddiqi MA, Kim HS, Jede F, Han I. Association of core needle biopsy tract resection with local recurrence in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:507-512. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Skrzynski MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA. Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:644-649. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Srisawat P, Veeraphun P, Punyaratabandhu T, Chareonvareekul S, Songpattanasilpa T, Sritanabutr P, Pipithkul S. Comparative study of diagnostic accuracy between office-based closed needle biopsy and open incisional biopsy in patiens with musculoskeletal sarcomas. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97(Suppl 2):S30-S38. Go to PubMed...
  21. Traina F, Errani C, Toscano A, Pungetti C, Fabbri D, Mazzotti A, Donati D, Faldini C. Current concepts in the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors: AAOS exhibit selection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:e7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Trnka V., Matějovský Z. Význam peroperační biopsie v diagnostice a léčbě nádorů pohybového ústrojí. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 1994;61:276-278. Go to PubMed...
  23. Yang YJ, Damron TA. Comparison of needle core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for diagnostic accuracy in musculoskeletal lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:759-764. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...