Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009; 76(1):41-46 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2009/007

Mortality Risk Factors in the Elderly with Proximal Femoral Fracture Treated SurgicallyOriginal papers

L. KOPP1,*, K. EDELMANN1, P. OBRUBA1, B. PROCHÁZKA2, K. BL©«ÁKOVÁ3, V. D®UPA4
1 Traumacentrum, Masarykova nemocnice, Ústí nad Labem
2 Oddělení matematické statistiky a programování, Státní zdravotní ústav, Praha
3 Nemocnice následné péče Ryjice, Ústí nad Labem
4 Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. LF UK a FNKV, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
To assess the effects of medical history, fracture type, method of treatment and complications on the risk of death in elderly patients treated for proximal femoral fracture.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The group comprised of 269 patients (219 women and 50 men) older than 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture at the Level I Traumacentre between January 2003 and June 2005. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 38 months.
In a prospective consecutive manner the following was recorded: age, gender, serious internal diseases, pre-injury level of mobility, place of living before injury, fracture type (AO classification), time between injury and surgery, anaesthesia, surgical technique, complications and death.
Statistical significance at the 95% level was ascertained using null-hypothesis tests for qualitative and quantitative variables by means of multivariate analysis.

RESULTS:
The average age of the patients was 81 years (range, 70 to 99 years). The higher the age, the shorter the time of survival (p=0.015) as each additional year reduced survival by 4.6%. The women to men ratio was 4.2:1. The male gender had a significantly shorter time of survival (p=0.007). Two and more serious internal diseases in the patient's medical history, as compared with a single one, also made survival significantly shorter (p<0.001). When, before injury, a patient moved without walking support, survival was significantly longer than in a patient using a walking cane/crutch (p=0.022) or two canes/crutches or a walker (p<0.001), or in a bedridden patient (p=0.014). The fact that, before injury, a patient was living in a pensioner's home had no effect on a shortened time of survival (p=0.136). Similarly, the fracture type (31A or 31B and subgroups) was not significant for the length of survival (p=0.903). The interval between injury and surgery was not a risk factor for survival (p=0.269). No effect of the type of anaesthesia on survival was found (p=0.450). Neither the surgical technique nor the type of implant was significant for survival time. When general internal complications occurred, they affected the length of survival significantly (p<0.001). Also, pressure sores developing in the post-operative period significantly shortened the time of survival (p=0.037). Early complications did not result in shorter survival (p=0.867), but late deep infection in ive patients significantly shortened their lives (p=0.008). Failed osteosynthesis and consequent revision surgery shortened survival time only when it occurred during the primary treatment (p=0.003); after the primary hospitalization was terminated, it had no effect on the length of survival (p=0.398).

DISCUSSION:
The study focused attention only to elderly patients with proximal femoral fracture treated surgically. The authors suggest that, by excluding patients treated conservatively, the group became more homogeneous and a more exact assessment of each factor's effect on death risk was possible.
The investigated factors were recorded only during the first year following injury; however, death was recorded by the end of the study. Using the assessment of cumulative survival, this allowed for a more accurate statistical evaluation of the effect of each factor on the risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS:
In patients over 70 years, a significantly shorter time of survival following the surgical treatment of proximal femoral fracture was found to be related to high age, male gender, multiple morbidity in the patient's medical history, poor patient's mobility before injury, general complications, development of pressure sores post-operatively, failed osteosynthesis requiring revision surgery and deep infection of the affected hip.
No relation to significantly shorter survival was found for the following factors: living in a pensioner's home before injury, fracture type, time between injury and surgery, type of anaesthesia and operative technique.

Keywords: hip fracture, surgical treatment, mortality, risk factors

Accepted: November 18, 2008; Published: February 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KOPP L, EDELMANN K, OBRUBA P, PROCHÁZKA B, BL©«ÁKOVÁ K, D®UPA V. Mortality Risk Factors in the Elderly with Proximal Femoral Fracture Treated Surgically. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009;76(1):41-46. doi: 10.55095/achot2009/007. PubMed PMID: 19268048.
Download citation

References

  1. HIP FRACTURES: prognostic factors for poor outcome following treatment. (Metaanalýza) Orthop. Trauma Dir., 1: 17-27, 2006. Go to original source...
  2. BARTONÍČEK, J.: Enderovo hřebování při zlomeninách proximálního femuru. III. část. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 65: 262-276, 1998.
  3. BAUDOIN, C., FARDELLONE, P., BEAN, K., OSTERTAG-EZEMBE, A., HERVY, F.: Clinical outcomes and mortality after hip fracture: a 2 year follow up study. Bone, 18 (Suppl. 3): 149S-157S, 1996. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. ČELKO, A. M.: Epidemiologie pádů seniorů v České republice. In.: Beneąová, V. (Ed.): Úrazy seniorů a moľnosti jejich prevence. Praha, CÚP UK 2. LF a FN Motol 2003, 29-32.
  5. ČELKO, A. M.: Epidemiologie úrazů v České republice. Postrgaduální medicína, 6: 400-404, 2004.
  6. D®UPA, V., BARTONÍČEK, J., SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM, J., PRÍKAZSKÝ, V.: Úmrtí pacientů se zlomeninou proximálního femuru v průběhu prvního roku po úrazu. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 69: 39-44, 2002.
  7. EDELSTEIN, D. M., AHARONOFF, G. B., KARP, A., CAPLA, E. L., ZUCKERMAN, J. D., KOVAL, K. J.: Effect of postoperative delirium on outcome after hip fracture. Clin. Orthop., 422: 195-200, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. EICHSTÄDT, H., KAISER, W., DAVID, T., DEL, N., CORDES, M.: Coxal femoral fractures - surgical management and internal medicine concomitant therapy in geriatric patients. Z. Gerontol., 27:253-259, 1994. Go to PubMed...
  9. EISLER, J., CORNWALL, R., STRAUSS, E., KOVAL, K., SIU, A., GILBERT, M.: Outcomes of elderly patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. Clin. Orthop., 399: 52-58, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. FARAHMAND, B. Y., MICHAËLSSON, K., AHLBOM, A., LJUNGHALL, S., BARON, J. A.: Survival after hip fracture. Osteoporosis Int., 16: 1583-1590, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. FORSÉN, L., SØGAARD, A. J., MEYER, H. E., EDNA, T-H., KOPJAR, B.: Survival after hip fracture: short- and long-term excess mortality according to age and gender. Osteoporosis Int., 10: 73-78, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. GEIGER, F., SCHREINER, K., SCHNEIDER, S., PAUSCHERT, R., THOMSEN, M.: Die proximale Femurfraktur des älteren Patienten. Orthopäde, 35: 651-658, 2006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. GEIGER, F., ZIMMERMANN-STENZEL, M., HEISEL, C., LEHNER, B., DAECKE, W.: Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality. Arch. Orthrop. Trauma Surg., 127: 959-966, 2007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. GRIMES, J. P., GREGORY, P. M., NOVECK, H., BUTLER, M. S., CARSON, J. L.: The effects of time-to-surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture. Amer. J. Med., 112: 702-709, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. GÜTTLER K., POKORNÝ D., SOSNA A.: Průběh arteria circumflexa femoris medialis a vyuľití znalosti při totálních náhradách kyčelního kloubu. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 74: 377-381, 2007. Go to original source...
  16. HAGESAVA, Y., SUZUKI, S., WINGSTRAND, H.: Risk of mortality following hip fracture in Japan. J. Orthop. Sci., 12: 113-117, 2007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. HEINZ, T. WÖHRY, G., VÉCSEI, V.: Stellenwerth der Gammanagelung bei der Versorgung von hüftgelenknahen Frakturen. Unfallchirurg, 97: 132-138, 1994. Go to original source...
  18. HUDSON, J. I., KENZORA, J. E., HEBEL, J. R., GARDNER, J. F., SCHERLIS, L., EPSTEIN, R. S., MAGAZINER, J. S.: Eight-year outcome associated with clinical options in the management of femoral neck fractures. Clin. Orthop., 348: 59-66, 1998. Go to original source...
  19. IMURA, K., ISHII, Y., YAGISAVA, K., MATSUEDA, M.: Postoperative ambulatory level after hip fracture in the elderly predicts survival rate. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 120:369-371, 2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. JAHODA, D., NYČ, O., POKORNÝ, D., LANDOR, I., SOSNA, A.: Antibiotika v prevenci infekčních komplikací u operací kloubních náhrad. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 73: 108-114, 2006. Go to original source...
  21. JAHODA D., NYČ O., ©IM©A J., KUČERA E., HANEK P., CHRZ P., POKORNÝ D., TAWA N., LANDOR I., SOSNA A.: Pozdní hematogenní infekce kloubních náhrad. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 88-92, 2008. Go to original source...
  22. JENSEN, J. S.: Determining factors for the mortality following hip fracture. Injury, 15: 411-414, 1984. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. JIANG, H. X., MAJUMDAR, S. R., DICK, D. A., MOREAU, M., RASO, J., OTTO, D. D., JOHNSTON, D. W.: Development and initial validation of a risk score for predicting in-hospital and 1-year mortality in patients with hip farctures. J. Bone Miner. Res., 20: 494-500, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. KURUP, H. V., MEHTA, R. L.: The male neck of femur. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 126: 181-183, 2006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Makai, F., Kokavec, M.: Geriatric orthopaedic. European Instructional Course Lectures, 7: 6-11, 2005.
  26. NIEMEYER, P., HAUSCHILD, O., STROHM, P. C., MÜLLER C. A., SÜDKAMP, N. P., KÖSTLER, W.: Fracture treatment in the erderly. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 71 329-338, 2004.
  27. O'HARA, D. A., DUFF, A., BERLIN, J. A., POSES, R. M., LAWRENCE, V. A., HUBER, E. C., NOVECK, H., STROM, B. L., CARSON, J. L.: The effect of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes in hip fracture repair. Anesthesiology, 92: 928-930, 2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. OCHSNER, P. E., MAJEWSKI, M., PLAASS, C.: Infection after osteosynthesis: A summary of the scientific presentations at the annual SwissAO meeting 2005 in Liestal. Injury, 37 (Suppl. 2): S117-S119, 2006.
  29. OROSZ, G. M., MAGAZINER, J., HANNAN, E. L., MORRISON, R. S., KOVAL, K., GILBERT, M., MCLAUGHLIN, M., HALM, E. A., WANG, J. J., LITKE, A., SILBERZWEIG, S. B., SIU, A. L.: Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes. JAMA, 291: 1738-1743, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. PARKER, M. J., MYLES, J. W., ANAND, J. K., DREWETT, R.: Cost benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment. J. Bone Jt Surg., 74-B: 261-264, 1992. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. PAVELKA, T., MATĚJKA, J., ČERVENKOVÁ, H.: Komplikace osteosyntézy krátkým proximálním femorálním hřebem. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 72: 344-354, 2005.
  32. RAAYMAKERS, E. L: Fractures of the femoral neck: A review and personal statement. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 73: 45-59, 2006. Go to original source...
  33. RAUNEST, J., ENGELMANN, R., JONAS, M., DERRA, E.: Morbidität und Letalität bei hüftgelenknahen Femurfrakturen im höheren Lebensalter. Unfallchirurg, 104: 325-332, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. SAKAKI, M. H., OLIVEIRA, A. R., COELHO, F. F., LEME, L. E., SUZUKI, I., AMATUZZI, M. M.: Estudo da mortalidade na fratura do femur proximal em idosos. Acta Orthop. Bras., 12: 242-249, 2004. Go to original source...
  35. SHERK, H. H., SNAPE, W. J., LOPRETE, F. L.: Internal fixation versus nontreatment of hip fractures in senile patients. Clin. Orthop., 141: 196-198, 1979. Go to original source...
  36. SCHWENK, W., EXSSEL, M., BADKE, A., HUCKE, H. P., STOCK, W.: Risk analysis of primary endoprosthetic management of proximal femur fractures. Unfallchirurgie, 20: 216-222, 1994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. ©«ASTNÍK, M.: Antimikrobní profylaxe v chirurgických oborech. Klin. Mikrobiol. Inf. Lek., 10: 73-79, 2004.
  38. VACULÍK, J., MALKUS, T., MAJERNÍČEK, M., POD©KUBKA, A., DUNGL, P.: Incidence zlomenin proximálního femuru. Ortopedie, 1: 62-68, 2007.
  39. VERSLUYSEN, M.: Pressure sores in elderly patients: the epidemiology related to hip operations. J. Bone Jt Surg., 67-B 1:10-13, 1985. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...