Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012; 79(2):107-113 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2012/015

Both Column Fractures of the Acetabulum: Epidemiology, Operative Management and Long-Term-ResultsOriginal papers

A. GÄNSSLEN1,*, M. FRINK2, F. HILDEBRAND2, C. KRETTEK2
1 Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Handchirurgie, Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
2 Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Both column fractures, defined as an acetabular fracture with no articular fragment in connection with the axial skeleton account for approximately 20% of all acetabular fractures. The typical type of a both column acetabular fracture is the C1.2 fracture with a multifragmentary anterior column fracture extending to the iliac crest and a large posterior column fragment in more than half of the patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The analysis of 135 surgically treated patients with both column fractures showed that more than half of these patients had associated injuries. The mean age was 40 years, and two thirds of these patients were male. A high energy trauma was the trauma mechanism in 87.4%. The mean ISS was 14.2 points.
The mean articular fracture displacement was 14.8 mm. 65.9% of the patients showed a central femoral head dislocation. An associated posterior wall fracture was present in 34.8% and an acetabular roof comminution in 34.1%. 8.9% of patients had a fracture related nerve damage.

RESULTS:
Osteosynthesis was performed 9.6 days after trauma. Several approaches were used for stabilization with a combination of plate and screw fixation in 71.9%. The mean operative time was 287 minutes with a blood loss of 1796 ml. Postoperatively the hip joint was congruent in 94.7% with anatomical or near-anatomical joint reconstruction in 75.6%. Iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 12 patients (8.9%).
89 patients (66.4%) could be followed after a mean of 54.6 months. The average subjective Visual Analog Scale pain score was 27.6. Mild or no pain was seen in 60.7%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15 with 60.7% of patients having a functionally perfect or good result. 61.8% had no post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes of their hip joint. A joint failure was diagnosed in 25.8% of the patients.

DISCUSSION:
Analysing only patients with anatomically reconstructed hip joints patients had better results with 69,8% having no or mild pain and a good or excellent functional result. Post-traumatic arthrotic changes occued in only 17.5% of these patients. A joint failure was present in 25.4%. In this group, a joint failure was significantly more likely to be present with an additional lesion of the femoral head and severe primary articular fracture displacement.

CONCLUSIONS:
In contrast to other acetabular fracture types, both column fractures show worser results regarding joint reconstruction, and functional and radiological long-term results. The optimal results can be achieved with anatomic joint recontsruction.

Keywords: acetabulum, both column fracrures, osteosynthesis

Published: April 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
GÄNSSLEN A, FRINK M, HILDEBRAND F, KRETTEK C. Both Column Fractures of the Acetabulum: Epidemiology, Operative Management and Long-Term-Results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(2):107-113. doi: 10.55095/achot2012/015. PubMed PMID: 22538099.
Download citation

References

  1. AHO, A., ISBERG, U., KATEVUO, V.: Acetabular posterior wall fracture - 38 cases followed for 5 years. Acta Orthop. Scand., 57: 101-105, 1986. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. BAKER, S., O NEILL, B.: The injury severity score: an update. J. Trauma, 16: 882-885, 1976. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. BOSCH, U., POHLEMANN, T., HAAS, N., TSCHERNE, H.: Klassifikation und Management des komplexen Beckentraumas. Unfallchirurg, 95: 189-196, 1992.
  4. BROOKER, A. et al.: Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J. Bone Jt Surg. 55-A: 1629-1632, 1973. Go to original source...
  5. CHEN, A. L., WOLINSKY, P. R., TEJWANI, N. C.: Hypogastric artery disruption associated with acetabular fracture. A report of two cases. J. Bone Jt Surg. 85-A: 333-338, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. CHEN, C., CHIU, F., LO, W., CHUNG, T.: Cerclage wiring in displaced both column fractures of the acetabulum. Injury, 32: 391-394, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. DEBRUNNER, H.: Orthopädisches Diagnostikum. 5. Aufl., Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, 34, 1987.
  8. FICAT, R., ARLET, J.: Ischemia and necrosis of bone. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore London, 1980.
  9. GIANNOUDIS, P. V., GROTZ, M. R., PAPAKOSTIDIS, C., DINOPOULOS, H.: Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J. Bone Jt Surg., 87-B: 2-9, 2005. Go to original source...
  10. HARRIS, H.: Traumatic Arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end result study using a new method of result evaluation. J. Bone Jt Surg., 51-A: 737-755, 1969. Go to original source...
  11. LETOURNEL, E., JUDET, R.: Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed., Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993. Go to original source...
  12. MASAHIRO, S., KENSEI, N., KENSUKE, S., KUNIHIKO, T., TAKANOBU, A., TOSHIYA, E., KMANABU, K., MASABUMI, I., TOMOYA, U.: Operative treatment of both column fractures in the acetabulum. Orthop. Traumatol., 51: 162-167, 2002. Go to original source...
  13. MATTA, J.: Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results of fractures operated within three weeks after the injury. J. Bone Jt Surg., 78-A: 1632-1645, 1996. Go to original source...
  14. MATTA, J., ANDERSON, L., EPSTEIN, H., HENDRICKS, P.: Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin. Orthop., 205: 230-240, 1986. Go to original source...
  15. MATTA, J., MEHNE, D., ROFFI, R.: Fractures of the acetabulum: early results of a prospective study. Clin. Orthop., 186: 241-250, 1986. Go to original source...
  16. MEARS, D., MACLEOD, M.: Acetabular fractures: triradiate and modified triradiate approaches. in: WISS, D. A., Master techniques in orthopaedic Surgery: Fractures, 697-724, 1998.
  17. MEARS, D. C., VELYVIS, J. H., CHANG, C. P.: Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin. Orthop., 407: 173-186, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. MERLE D'AUBIGNÉ, M.: Traitement chirurgical de la coxarthrie. Soc. Intern. de Chirurgie Orthopaedique, 240-247, 1948.
  19. MOED, B. R., WILLSONCARR, S. E., WATSON, J. T.: Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J. Bone Jt Surg., 84-A: 752-758, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. MOORE, E., COGBILL, T., MALANGONI, M., JURKOVICH, G., SHACKFORD, S., CHAMPION, H., McANNICH, J.: Organ injury scaling. Surg. Clin. North Am., 75: 293-303, 1995. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. OTA, Fracture and dislocation compendium. J. Orthop. Trauma, 10(Suppl. 1): 71-75, 1996.
  22. POHLEMANN, T., GÄNSSLEN, A., HARTUNG, S.: Für die Arbeitsgruppe Becken: Beckenverletzungen/Pelvic injuries. Hefte zu "Der Unfallchirurg", 1998. Heft 266.
  23. ROMMENS, P., GIMENEZ, M., HESSMANN, M.: Is the posterior wall avulsion the simplest acetabular fracture? Eur. J. Trauma, 26: 144-154, 2000. Go to original source...
  24. TEASDALE, G., JENETT, B.: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet, 2: 81-83, 1974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. TSCHERNE, H., REGEL, G., STURM, J., FRIEDL, H.: Schweregrad und Prioritäten bei Mehrfachverletzungen. Chirurg, 58: 631-640, 1987.
  26. ZINGHI, G., BRICCOLI, A., BUNGARO, P., DAVOLI, O., PONZIANI, L., ROLLO, G., TRONO, M.: Chapter twelve: Fractures in several planes. in Zinghi, G. F.: Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum, Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, 219-234, 2004.