Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018; 85(1):40-45 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2018/006

Epidemiologická studie vlivu pohlaví, věku, mobility a doby úrazu na zlomeniny proximálního femuruPůvodní práce

L. ZELENKA1,2,*, J. ALT1, I. KNÍ®KOVÁ3, P. KUNC3, D. LUKE©OVÁ2
1 Klinika ortopedie 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Ústřední vojenské nemocnice - Vojenské fakultní nemocnice Praha
2 Katedra chovu zvířat a potravinářství v tropech, FTZ, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze
3 Výzkumných ústav ľivočiąné výroby, v. v. i., Praha - Uhříněves

PURPOSE OF STUDY
Based on the selected criteria the study presents the evaluation of data of patients who underwent a surgery for proximal femoral fracture at the Department of Orthopaedic Trauma of the 1st Faculty of Medicine and Military University Hospital Prague in the period 2013-2016. The paper aimed to determine whether there are any differences in proximal femoral fractures depending on the selected criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The study comprised 805 patients (562 women and 243 men) older than 21 years with proximal femoral fractures who were treated between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. In the study, the patient s data on gender, age, a type of fracture (according to the AO classification), a level of mobility, time of injury and month of injury were analysed. The data was evaluated using the methods of descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, two-way analysis by ANOVA and by following select POST-HOC test (Fisher LSD test) were utilized, 95% confidence interval was selected.

RESULTS:
In the group of treated patients, the men were outnumbered by women (70% vs. 30%). In women the fractures occurred at a significantly (p < 0.001) older age (82 years) compared to men (77 years). Until the 8th decade the fractures in men dominated, while from the 9th decade the fractures were more frequent in women. A sharp increase in the number of fractures in women was reported exactly in the 9th decade (56% of the total number of fractures in women). The group of women showed a significant difference (p = 0.027) between the age of femoral neck fractures and the age of trochanteric femoral fractures (80 years vs. 84 years). In both genders intracapsular and pertrochanteric fractures prevailed.
In women and men with a limited mobility, fractures were sustained at the highest mean age (85 years in women, 84 years in men) compared to the other levels of mobility. In mobile patients, a significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between the age of women and men at which the fracture was sustained (79 years vs. 71 years). The largest significant difference (p < 0.001) in the age of fracture is seen in night time (84 years in women, 71 years in men). The highest number of injuries was suffered in the months of October to January, whereas the lowest number was reported in the period from June to July.

DISCUSSION:
The epidemiological studies underline a notably higher incidence of proximal femoral fractures in women than in men, which was also confirmed by our study. The mean age of women with proximal femoral fracture was significantly higher compared to men. Similar conclusions have been drawn also by other studies. The incidence of fractures in dependence on the age group was the highest in women and men in their 9th decade, which compared to the previous studies was at a later age. This finding can be justified by aging of the Czech population, with the growing number of persons in the 9th decade age group between 2012 and 2017 by 40,000. Nonetheless, men prevailed in fractures until the 9th decade, while from the 9th decade there is a marked growth in the number of these fractures sustained by women. This corresponds with the findings of other authors. As to the individual types of fractures (neck, trochanteric fracture) no difference was revealed in the percentage of women and men. In both genders intracapsular and petrochanteric fractures prevailed. Neither the level of pre-fracture mobility, nor the time of injury have been sufficiently monitored and evaluated with regard to the age of patients, therefore there is no adequate data to compare our results with. The lowest mean age at the time of injury was achieved by fully mobile men (71 years), which can be attributable to their sports and social activities performed at this age. The highest number of proximal femoral fractures was reported in the period from October to January, whereas their lowest number was reported in the period from June to July, which corresponds with the majority of other conducted studies in this area of research.

CONCLUSIONS:
A considerably higher incidence of proximal femoral fractures in women was confirmed. The mean age of women with proximal femoral fracture was significantly higher than in men (82 vs. 77 years). Men prevailed in the number of fractures up to the 9th decade, whereas from the 9th decade the number of proximal femoral fractures in women significantly grew. In individual types of fractures (neck, trochanteric fractures), no difference in percentage of women and men was found. In both the genders intracapsular and pertrochanteric fractures significantly prevailed. The lowest mean age (71 years) at the time of injury was achieved by fully mobile men. The same age was identified in men also with respect to injuries sustained at night. The highest number of proximal femoral fractures was reported in the period from October to January, the lowest in the period from June to July. The knowledge of these seasonal variations can help plan the health care in the medical facility concerned.

Klíčová slova: proximal femur, fracture, gender, mobility, day-time, seasonality

Zveřejněno: 1. únor 2018  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ZELENKA L, ALT J, KNÍ®KOVÁ I, KUNC P, LUKE©OVÁ D. Epidemiologická studie vlivu pohlaví, věku, mobility a doby úrazu na zlomeniny proximálního femuru. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):40-45. doi: 10.55095/achot2018/006. PubMed PMID: 30257768.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Báča V, Kachlík D, Horák Z, Stingl J. The course of osteons in the compact bone of the human proximal femur - morphological study with clinical and biomechanical notes. Surg Rad Anat. 2007;29:201-207. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  2. Bartoníček J, Dľupa V, Frič V, Pacovský V, Skála-Rosenbaum J, Svatoą F. Epidemiologie a ekonomie zlomenin proximálního femuru, proximálního humeru, distálního radia a luxačních zlomenin hlezna. Rozhl Chir. 2008;87:2213-219.
  3. Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Orav JE, Barrett JA, Baron JA. Effect of seasonality and weather on fracture risk in individuals 65 years and older. Osteoporos Int. 2007;8:1225-1233. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Boddaert J, Raux M, Khiami F, Riou, B. Hip fractures: epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Fr Med Urgence. 2015;5:199-125. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Bonafede M, Sbi N, Barron R, Li X, Crittenden DB, Chandler D. Predicting imminent risk of fracture in patients aged 50 or older with osteoporosis using US Claim data. Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11:26. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  6. Bulajic Kopjar M. Seasonal variations in incidence of fractures among elderly people. Inj Prev. 2000;6:16-19. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  7. Burget F, Foltán O, Kraus J, Kudrna K, Novák, M, Ulrych J. Influence of the weather on the incidence of fractures in the elderly. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83:69-273. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Burget F, Pleva L, Kudrna K, Kudrnova Z. Incidence of proximal femur fractures in relation to seasons of the year and weather. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:14-143. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Cauley JACD, Kassem AM, Fuleihan GH. Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10:338-351. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  10. Caeiro JR, Bartra A, Mesa-Ramon M, Etxebarria I, Montejo J, Capintero P, Sorio F, Gatell S, Farre A, Canals L. Burden of first osteoporosis hip fracture in Spain: a prospective, 12 month, observation study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100:29-39. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. Crawford JR, Parker MJ. Seasonal variation of proximal femoral fractures in the United Kingdom. Injury. 2003;34:223-225. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  12. Čevela R, Čeledová L, Kalvach Z, Holčík J, Kubů P. Sociální gerontologie, 1. vyd. Grada Publishing, Praha, 2014, p 24.
  13. Dyer SM, Crotty M, Fairhall N, Magaziner J, Beaupre L, Cameron ID, Scherrington C. A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:158. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  14. Dľupa V, Bartoníček J, Skála-Rosenbaum J. Ekonomické aspekty léčení zlomenin proximálního femuru v naąich podmínkách. Cas Lek Ces. 1999;138:756-758.
  15. Emmaus N, Olsen LR, Ahmed LA, Balteskard L, Jacobsen BK, Magnus T, Ytterstad B. Hip fractures in a city in Northern Norway over 15 years: time trends, seasonal variation and mortality: the Harstad injury prevention study. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:2603-2610. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  16. Finsterwald M, Sidelnikov E, Orav EJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Theiler R, Egli A, Platz A, Simmen HP, Meier C, Grob D, Beck S, Stahelin HB, Bischoff-Ferrari HA. Gender-specific hip fracture risk in community-dwelling and institutionalized seniors age 65 years and older. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:167-176. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  17. Gregory JS, Testi D, Stewart A., Undrill PE, Reid DM, Aspden RM. A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:5-11. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  18. Gronskag AB, Forsmo S, Romundstad P, Langhammer A, Schei B. Incidence and seasonal variation in hip fracture incidence among elderly women in Norway. The HUNT Study Bone. 2010;46:1294-1298 Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  19. Hektoen LF, Saltvedt I, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Luras H, Halsteinli V. One-year health and care costs after hip fracture for home-dwelling elderly patients in Norway: Results from the Trondheim Hip Fracture Trial. Scand J Public Health. 2016;44:791-798. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  20. Horii M, Fujiwara H, Mikami Y, Ikeda T, Ueshima K, Ikoma K, Toshiharu T, Nagae M, Oka Y, Sawada K, Kuriyama NT. Differences in monthly variation, cause, and place of injury between femoral neck and trochanteric fractures: 6-year survey (2008 - 2013) in Kyoto prefecture, Japan. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2016;13:19-24. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  21. Hoza P, Hála T, Pilný J. Zlomeniny proximálního femuru a jejich řeąení. Med Pro Praxi. 2008;5:393-397.
  22. Jacobsen SJ, Sargent DJ, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd.. Population based study of the contribution of weather to hip fracture seasonality. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:79-83. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  23. Koren L, Barak A, Norman D, Sachs O, Peled E. Effect of Seasonality, Weather and holidays on the incidence of proximal hip fracture. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16:299-302. Přejít na PubMed...
  24. Lamb JN, Panteli M, Pneumaticos SG, Giannoudis PV. Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40:225-232. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  25. Lukaszyk C, Harvey L, Sherrington C, Keay L, Tiedemann A, Coombes J, Clemson L, Ivers, R. Risk factors, incidence, consequences and prevention strategies for falls and fall-injury within older indigenous populations: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40:664-568. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  26. Odén A, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H. The effect of latitude on the risk and seasonal variation in hip fracture in Sweden. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:2217-2223. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  27. Ortiz CR, Tenias JM, Estarlich M, Ballester F. Systematic review of the associationbetween climate and hip fractures. Int J Biometeorol. 2015;59:1511-1522. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  28. Skála-Rosenbaum J., Baroníček J, Říha D, Waldauf P, Dľupa, V. Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic. Int Orthop. 2011;35:587-593. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  29. Solbakken SM, Magnus JH, Meyer HE, Emmaus N, Tell GS, Holvik K, Grimnes G, Forsmo S, Schei B, Sogaard AJ, Omsland TK. Impact of comorbidity, age, and gender on seasonal variation in hip fracture incidence. A NOREPOS study. Arch Osteoporos. 2014;9:191. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  30. Tenías JM, Estarlich M, Román-Ortiz C, Angel Arias-Arias A, Ballester F. Short-term relationship between hip gracture and weather conditions in two Spanish health areas with different climates. J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:ID 395262:8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  31. Wei TS, Hu CH, Wang SH, Hwang KL. Fall characteristics, functional mobility and bone mineral density as risk factors of hip fracture in the community-dwelling ambulatory elderly. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:1050-1055. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...