Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018; 85(3):165-170 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2018/027

Establishing an Interdisciplinary Compulsory Elective Subject 'Spine' in the Curriculum of the University Study Course of Human MedicineOriginal papers

T. ZIPPELIUS1,*, W. WESCHENFELDER3, S. O. EICKER4, M. PUTZIER2, E. RÖHNER1, G. MATZIOLIS1, P. STRUBE1
1 Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Germany
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
3 Department of Traumatology, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Jena, Germany
4 Department of Neurosurgery at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Back pain and pathologies of the spine are among the main reasons why people consult a doctor, both general practitioners and paediatricians, as well as, specifically, orthopaedists, surgeons, and neurosurgeons. This involvement of different faculties calls for a high degree of interdisciplinary co-operation. In order to mediate these aspects of spine-specific diagnostics, therapy, and research to students during their studies and to promote up-and-coming specialists, the compulsory elective subject 'Spine' was established.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
From the winter semester of 2013 to the winter semester of 2014, the compulsory elective subject 'Spine' was offered to interested students in the 7th semester of their studies of human medicine. The maximum number of participants per course was 16. Each course lasted four weeks. The subjects taught covered the fields of degeneration, deformities, and destruction in the specialist disciplines of orthopaedics, traumatology, neurosurgery, and rehabilitation medicine. In addition, orthopaedic technology and the local musculoskeletal and biomechanical research institute were integrated into the course. Various teaching methods were applied, including problem oriented learning, seminars, observation or consultation, and internship. At the end, the course was evaluated with regard to subjective learning success, knowledge gain, satisfaction, and interdisciplinarity. Participants were compared with all students of the semester employing an objectively structured clinical examination (OSCE).

RESULTS:
Forty-eight students took part in the compulsory elective subject 'Spine'. The compulsory elective subject was given a positive rating in all fields. In the learning success control, all of the students had good to very good results. Students attending the elective subject performed significantly better in the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) (p ≤ 0.001).
The compulsory elective course continues to be offered in the curriculum with a slightly altered schedule.

CONCLUSIONS:
In view of the high prevalence of patients with back pain and its associated importance in terms of healthcare policy and social relevance, our experience leads us to recommend the general integration of such a compulsory elective subject in the study of human medicine.

Keywords: elective subject, spine, students, spinal disorders

Published: June 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ZIPPELIUS T, WESCHENFELDER W, EICKER SO, PUTZIER M, RÖHNER E, MATZIOLIS G, STRUBE P. Establishing an Interdisciplinary Compulsory Elective Subject 'Spine' in the Curriculum of the University Study Course of Human Medicine. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(3):165-170. doi: 10.55095/achot2018/027. PubMed PMID: 30257774.
Download citation

References

  1. Akesson K, Dreinhöfer KE, Woolf AD. Improved education in musculoskeletal conditions is necessary for all doctors. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:677-683. Go to PubMed...
  2. Al-Nammari SS, Pengas I, Asopa V, Jawad A, Rafferty M, Ramachandran M. The inadequacy of musculoskeletal knowledge in graduating medical students in the United Kingdom. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:e36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bilderback K, Eggerstedt J, Sadasivan KK, Seelig L, Wolf R, Barton S, McCall R, Chesson AL, Marino AA. Design and implementation of a system-based course in musculoskeletal medicine for medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2292-2300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Brooks PM. The burden of musculoskeletal disease - a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol. 2006;25:778-781. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Day CS, Bernstein J, Boyer MI. Educating medical students in musculoskeletal surgery and medicine-how to get a course up and running at your institution: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e1761-1766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. DiCaprio MR, Covey A, Bernstein J. Curricular requirements for musculoskeletal medicine in American medical schools. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:565-567. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. DiGiovanni BF, Southgate RD, Mooney CJ, Chu JY, Lambert DR, O'Keefe RJ. Factors impacting musculoskeletal knowledge and clinical confidence in graduating medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dreinhöfer KE. [The bone and joint decade - chances for orthopedics and traumatic surgery]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007;145:399-402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Freedman KB, Bernstein J. The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1421-1427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Freedman KB, Bernstein J. Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A:604-608. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kelly M, Feeley I, Boland F, O'Byrne JM. Undergraduate clinical teaching in orthopedic surgery: A randomized control trial comparing the effect of case-based teaching and bedside teaching on musculoskeletal OSCE performance. J Surg Educ. [Epub ahead of print 2017] 2018;75:132-139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lidgren L. The bone and joint decade 2000-2010. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:629. Go to PubMed...
  13. Neuser J. [Medical education in the dilemma between theory and praxis. The reforms in medical studies make an impact]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 2009;52:841-844. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Pinney SJ, Regan WD. Educating medical students about musculoskeletal problems. Are community needs reflected in the curricula of Canadian medical schools? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1317-1320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Ruesseler M, Obertacke U, Dreinhöfer KE, Waydhas C, Marzi I, Walcher F. [Undergraduate education in orthopaedic and trauma surgery - a nationwide survey in Germany]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2011;149:27-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Skelley NW, Tanaka MJ, Skelley LM, LaPorte DM. Medical student musculoskeletal education: an institutional survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e146(141-147). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Vioreanu MH, O'Daly BJ, Shelly MJ, Devitt BM, O'Byrne JM. Design, implementation and prospective evaluation of a new interactive musculoskeletal module for medical students in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci. 2013;182:191-199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade. strategies to reduce the burden of disease: the Bone and Joint Monitor Project. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2003;67:6-9. Go to PubMed...